Growth is usually a good thing.
More customers and employees.
More revenue and opportunities.
But also change and hard calls.
Different Demand.
New difficult decisions
More relationships to balance.
A founder who is great at building a company from nothing may not be the person who is best at running that same company once it has 200 employees, multiple layers of management, and investors sitting around the table.
And that doesn’t necessarily mean the founder wasn’t successful.
Maybe the job just changed.
The Same Title, Different Job
We tend to think of CEO as one job.
It really isn’t.
Early on, a founder-CEO might be developing the product, talking to customers, hiring the first employees, solving whatever problem showed up that day, and probably doing a few things that weren’t technically their job at all.
Then the company grows.
Suddenly the CEO is managing executives, building organizational systems, working with a board, thinking about capital, and making decisions that affect hundreds of people.
Same title.
Very different job.
So when we ask whether a founder should stay CEO, I think we’re asking the wrong question.
The better question is:
Is this still the role where this founder can create the most value?
What If Success Means Outgrowing Your Own Job?
We usually think about being replaced as evidence that someone wasn’t good enough.
But what if sometimes it is evidence that the company has become something different?
A founder may be incredible at taking an idea from nothing to something.
That requires vision, risk tolerance, persistence, product knowledge, and a willingness to operate without much certainty.
Scaling can require something else.
Systems.
Processes.
Delegation.
Executive hiring.
Organizational structure.
Capital management.
Those aren’t necessarily better skills.
They’re just different ones.
And the person who was exactly right for the company at 10 employees might not be exactly right for the company at 500.
Designing Yourself Out of a Job
I actually like this idea more than I expected to.
Because designing yourself out of a job sounds like failure until you think about what it actually means.
If the company cannot function without the founder personally making every important decision, the founder hasn’t really built an organization yet.
They’ve built something that depends on them.
As a company grows, the founder’s job should probably become less about doing everything and more about building the people and systems that allow other people to do things.
That could mean staying CEO.
It could mean becoming Executive Chair.
It could mean moving into a product role, COO role, or something else that better fits the founder’s strengths.
Leaving the CEO role doesn’t necessarily mean leaving the company.
Sometimes it means finding the role that actually makes better use of what the founder is good at.
Founder-Role Fit
We talk constantly about product-market fit.
But I wonder if there is also such a thing as founder-role fit.
The role that fits someone on Day 1 may not fit them on Day 1,000.
And I think that should be okay.
People change.
Companies change.
The problems that need solving change.
Why wouldn’t the role change too?
Leadership development matters here, too. If a founder knows the company will eventually need a different kind of leadership, that doesn’t have to be a surprise at the end of the road. They can start building those capabilities into the organization long before the transition becomes necessary.
Maybe that means developing another executive.
Maybe it means learning new skills themselves.
Maybe it means recognizing that someone else is better suited for the next stage.
None of those options are necessarily failures.
So What?
I don’t think the goal of entrepreneurship should be to hold onto the CEO title for as long as possible.
I also don’t think replacing a founder is automatically the right answer.
A founder may be the best person to lead the company through its next stage.
Or they may be the best person to help the company in a completely different role.
The company is going to change whether the founder is ready for it or not.
And if leadership is really about creating value for the organization, then the question shouldn’t be:
“What role do I want to keep?”
It should be:
“Where can I contribute the most as this company becomes something new?”
Maybe a successful company doesn’t just outgrow its original systems.
Maybe, eventually, it outgrows the original version of everyone’s job—including the founder’s.
Leave a comment